From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Las Vegas Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
May 16, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-00915-MMD-CWH (D. Nev. May. 16, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-00915-MMD-CWH

05-16-2013

BARRYMORE C. COX, Plaintiff, v. LAS VEGAS POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

(dkt. no. 14)

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (dkt. no. 14), entered by the Honorable Carl W. Hoffman, Jr., regarding Plaintiff Barrymore C. Cox's failure to pay the filing fee as ordered by the Court in its February 6, 2013, Orders (see dkt. nos. 12 and 13). No objection was filed to Magistrate Judge Hoffman's Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, this matter was referred to the undersigned for consideration.

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B)-(C) and Local Rule IB 3-2 and determines that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hoffman should be accepted and adopted in whole. Plaintiff's failure to pay the required filing fee necessitates dismissal of this action.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (dkt. no. 14) is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED for failure to pay the filing fee. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.

____________________

MIRANDA M. DU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cox v. Las Vegas Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
May 16, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-00915-MMD-CWH (D. Nev. May. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Cox v. Las Vegas Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:BARRYMORE C. COX, Plaintiff, v. LAS VEGAS POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: May 16, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-00915-MMD-CWH (D. Nev. May. 16, 2013)