From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. L.A. Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 12, 2019
Case No. 2:19-cv-07702-PA (SHK) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 2:19-cv-07702-PA (SHK)

11-12-2019

JOHNNIE DARNELL COX, Plaintiff, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY, et al., Defednant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that all federal causes of action against the County, Superior Court, and individual Defendants in their official and individual capacities, are dismissed with prejudice; and . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IT IS ORDERED that the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction on all of Plaintiff's state law claims against the County, Superior Court and individual Defendants and the claims are dismissed without prejudice. Dated: November 12, 2019

/s/_________

HONORABLE PERCY ANDERSON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cox v. L.A. Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 12, 2019
Case No. 2:19-cv-07702-PA (SHK) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2019)
Case details for

Cox v. L.A. Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNIE DARNELL COX, Plaintiff, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY, et al., Defednant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 12, 2019

Citations

Case No. 2:19-cv-07702-PA (SHK) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2019)