From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Kernan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 22, 2021
2:19-cv-1637 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-1637 JAM DB P

11-22-2021

ERNEST LEE COX, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 26, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. (ECF No. 30.) Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 31.) Defendants filed a response to plaintiff's objections (ECF No. 32) and plaintiff filed a reply to defendants' response (ECF No. 33).

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 26, 2021 (ECF No. 30), are ADOPTED in full;

2. Defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.


Summaries of

Cox v. Kernan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 22, 2021
2:19-cv-1637 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Cox v. Kernan

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST LEE COX, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 22, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-1637 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2021)