From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Katz

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 17, 1968
242 N.E.2d 486 (N.Y. 1968)

Opinion

Submitted October 16, 1968

Decided October 17, 1968


Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur is requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellants contended that they were denied equal protection under the law contrary to the one man-one vote principle, contrary to the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, and further that the Negro and Puerto Rican voters were, by said action, discriminated against by reason of their race, color and national origin and thus their right to effective franchise was diluted or destroyed contrary to the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments of the Constitution. The Court of Appeals considered these contentions and held that there was no violation of appellants' constitutional rights.


Summaries of

Cox v. Katz

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 17, 1968
242 N.E.2d 486 (N.Y. 1968)
Case details for

Cox v. Katz

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET COX et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Other…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 17, 1968

Citations

242 N.E.2d 486 (N.Y. 1968)
242 N.E.2d 486
295 N.Y.S.2d 335

Citing Cases

Dorfman v. Berman

That aside, the application even after consideration of the merits must nonetheless be denied. While the…