From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Inland Dredging Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 20, 2016
CA 15-0032-WS-C (S.D. Ala. May. 20, 2016)

Opinion

CA 15-0032-WS-C

05-20-2016

DAVID E. COX, Plaintiff, v. INLAND DREDGING COMPANY, LLC, etc., et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action is due to be, and hereby is, DISMISSED, in accordance with Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, due to plaintiff's failure to prosecute this action by obeying this Court's lawful orders dated January 25, 2016, March 7, 2016, and March 8, 2016, and ignoring the defendants' valid attempts to conduct court-authorized discovery.

DONE this 20th day of May, 2016.

s/ WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cox v. Inland Dredging Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 20, 2016
CA 15-0032-WS-C (S.D. Ala. May. 20, 2016)
Case details for

Cox v. Inland Dredging Co.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID E. COX, Plaintiff, v. INLAND DREDGING COMPANY, LLC, etc., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 20, 2016

Citations

CA 15-0032-WS-C (S.D. Ala. May. 20, 2016)