From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 27, 1979
598 P.2d 1264 (Or. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

No. 77-6720-E, CA 12776

Argued April 18, 1979

Affirmed August 27, 1979

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

Marshall C. Cheney, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

James L. Francesconi, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Doblie, Bischoff Murray, P.C., Eugene.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Richardson, and Roberts, Judges.


RICHARDSON, J.

Affirmed.


In 1968 claimant suffered an industrial injury and was awarded permanent partial disability. The award was increased in three separate orders prior to 1974 when claimant's aggravation rights expired. ORS 656.273(4)(a).

In 1977, the Workers' Compensation Board, in response to claimant's petition, exercised its own motion jurisdiction and increased claimant's award to permanent total disability.

Employer appeals claiming that the Board lacks jurisdiction to award additional compensation for aggravation after claimant's aggravation rights have expired. ORS 656.278 is to the contrary. See also Short v. SAIF, 38 Or. App. 523, 590 P.2d 1238, rev den, 284 Or. 341 (1979); Coombs v. SAIF, 39 Or. App. 293, 592 P.2d 242 (1979).

Employer also contends claimant has failed to sustain his burden of proof that his present condition is an aggravation of the 1968 industrial injury. This is a factual issue and after a review of the record we are persuaded the Board's findings were correct. Bowman v. Oregon Transfer Company, 33 Or. App. 241, 576 P.2d 27 (1978).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Cox v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 27, 1979
598 P.2d 1264 (Or. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Cox v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.

Case Details

Full title:COX, Respondent, v. EDWARD HINES LUMBER CO., Petitioner

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 27, 1979

Citations

598 P.2d 1264 (Or. Ct. App. 1979)
598 P.2d 1264