From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Frost

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 5, 1978
249 S.E.2d 695 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

56270.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 11, 1978.

DECIDED OCTOBER 5, 1978.

Action on account. Clarke Superior Court. Before Judge Gaines.

James W. Smith, for appellant.

Harvey, Willard, Elliott Olsen, E. Christopher Harvey, Alan C. Harvey, for appellee.


The plaintiff, movant for summary judgment, having introduced evidence showing that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that it was entitled to prevail on the undisputed facts, and the defendant having then rested on its pleadings without offering any evidence to suggest any remaining factual issue, the trial court's grant of the motion for summary judgment was correct. E. g., McCracken v. Gainesville Tribune, 146 Ga. App. 274, 277 ( 246 S.E.2d 360) (1978).

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Banke, J., concur.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 11, 1978 — DECIDED OCTOBER 5, 1978.


Summaries of

Cox v. Frost

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 5, 1978
249 S.E.2d 695 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Cox v. Frost

Case Details

Full title:COX v. FROST

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 5, 1978

Citations

249 S.E.2d 695 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
147 Ga. App. 429

Citing Cases

Match Point, Ltd. v. Adams

In the face of that evidence, appellants' arguments, unsupported by evidence, are insufficient. Summary…

Govindasamy v. Wells Fakgo Bank, N.A.

We find that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment when Govindasamy failed to provide any…