From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Daram

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 29, 2021
2:20-cv-1295 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-1295 KJM DB P

09-29-2021

ERNEST LEE COX, Jr., Plaintiff, v. VASUKI DARAM, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 18, 2021, this court recommended the district judge grant defendants' motion to dismiss for plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit. On September 13, 2021, plaintiff filed a complaint, motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and motion for a preliminary injunction. On September 20, plaintiff filed a copy of his prisoner trust account statement. The Clerk of the Court inadvertently filed these documents in the present case, labelling the complaint a third amended complaint. From the face of the complaint, it is apparent that plaintiff intended to initiate a new action.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. The complaint (ECF No. 51), motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 52), and motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 53) filed September 13, 2021 are dismissed without prejudice.
2. The prisoner trust account statement (ECF No. 54) filed September 20, 2021 is dismissed without prejudice.
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to open a new action and include the documents filed by plaintiff on September 13 and September 20, 2021.


Summaries of

Cox v. Daram

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 29, 2021
2:20-cv-1295 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Cox v. Daram

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST LEE COX, Jr., Plaintiff, v. VASUKI DARAM, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 29, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-1295 KJM DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2021)