From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Cantu

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Jan 26, 2012
NO. 01-11-00642-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 26, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 01-11-00642-CV

01-26-2012

ALLEN COX D/B/A QUEST DESIGNS AND CONSTRUCTION, Appellant v. KATHERINE CANTU, Appellee


On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 961292


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Allen Cox d/b/a Quest Designs and Construction, has neither established indigence nor paid all the required fees. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2010) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees.

We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp, and Brown.


Summaries of

Cox v. Cantu

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Jan 26, 2012
NO. 01-11-00642-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Cox v. Cantu

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN COX D/B/A QUEST DESIGNS AND CONSTRUCTION, Appellant v. KATHERINE…

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Jan 26, 2012

Citations

NO. 01-11-00642-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 26, 2012)