Cox v. Biter

Full title: EVERETT LEE COX, Petitioner, v. M.D. BITER, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Jun 26, 2013

CV 12-10028 ABC (AN) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2013)

Opinion

EVERETT LEE COX, Petitioner, v. M.D. BITER, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 12-10028 ABC (AN). United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. June 26, 2013.

          ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          AUDREY B. COLLINS, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the file, including the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") and Petitioner's Objection [23]. Further, the Court has completed a de novo review of those portions of the R&R to which Petitioner has objected.

         IT IS ORDERED that:

         1. The Objection, which adds nothing to the arguments already raised in the Petition, is overruled for the reasons set forth in the R&R.

         2. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the R&R.

         3. Judgment shall be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

         4. All pending motions are denied as moot and terminated.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order and the Judgment on all counsel or parties of record.