From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Bennett

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jun 28, 2023
3:23-cv-5036-JHC-TLF (W.D. Wash. Jun. 28, 2023)

Opinion

3:23-cv-5036-JHC-TLF

06-28-2023

Brian Gleen Cox, Petitioner, v. Jason Bennett, Respondent.


ORDER

Theresa L. Fricke United States Magistrate Judge

On June 15, 2023, counsel for petitioner Brian Cox filed a motion to withdraw as counsel. Dkt. 14. Counsel indicated that the CJA Administrator has located a new attorney to take over the matter once the Federal Public Defender is permitted to withdraw from the case.

Pursuant to Local Civil Rule (LCR) 83.2(b)(1), “a motion for withdrawal shall be noted in accordance with LCR 7(d)(3) or CrR (12(b) and shall include a certification that the motion was served on the client and opposing counsel.” Here, counsel for Mr. Cox did not include a certification that the motion was served on Mr. Cox or on opposing counsel.

Thus, their motion to withdraw as counsel is DENIED without prejudice for failure to comply with the local rules.


Summaries of

Cox v. Bennett

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jun 28, 2023
3:23-cv-5036-JHC-TLF (W.D. Wash. Jun. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Cox v. Bennett

Case Details

Full title:Brian Gleen Cox, Petitioner, v. Jason Bennett, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jun 28, 2023

Citations

3:23-cv-5036-JHC-TLF (W.D. Wash. Jun. 28, 2023)