From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 29, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00199-AP (D. Colo. May. 29, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00199-AP

05-29-2012

DENISE C. COX, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

For Plaintiff : Virginia L. Card Smith Attorney for Plaintiff For Defendant : John F. Walsh United States Attorney Kevin T. Traskos Deputy Civil Chief United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado William G. Pharo Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado Michael Howard Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:

Virginia L. Card Smith

Attorney for Plaintiff

For Defendant:

John F. Walsh

United States Attorney

Kevin T. Traskos

Deputy Civil Chief

United States Attorney's Office

District of Colorado

William G. Pharo

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

District of Colorado

Michael Howard

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint was filed: January 25, 2012
B. Date Complaint was served on U.S. Attorney's Office: March 9, 2012
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record were filed: May 9, 2012

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and accurate. Notwithstanding, the parties would reserve objections regarding the adequacy of the record for the parties' respective briefs on the merits of the case.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not intend to submit additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe the case raises unusual claims or defenses.

7. OTHER MATTERS

The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

The parties respectfully request the following briefing schedule:
A. Plaintiff's opening brief due: July 6, 2012
B. Defendant's response brief due: August 5, 2012
C. Plaintiff's reply brief (if any) due: August 20, 2012

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

Plaintiff requests oral argument. The Commissioner does not request oral argument at this time.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Not all parties consent to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. OTHER MATTERS

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C. COLO.L.CivR. 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED:

____________

Virginia L. Card Smith

Attorney for Plaintiff

John F. Walsh

United States Attorney

Kevin T. Traskos

Deputy Civil Chief

United States Attorney's Office

District of Colorado

William G. Pharo

United States Attorney's Office

District of Colorado

____________

Michael S. Howard

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration

Attorneys for Defendant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on May 29, 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing "Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases" with the with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECMF system which will send notification of such filing to the following e-mail address(es):

vsmith3470@aol.com
usa-co-civil_ecf@usdoj.gov

Michael S. Howard

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration


Summaries of

Cox v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 29, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00199-AP (D. Colo. May. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Cox v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DENISE C. COX, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: May 29, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00199-AP (D. Colo. May. 29, 2012)