From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

COX v. ASTRUE

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Dec 9, 2011
Civ. NO. 09-1415-CL (D. Or. Dec. 9, 2011)

Opinion

Civ. NO. 09-1415-CL.

December 09, 2011.


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).

I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error in the Report and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#29) is adopted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

COX v. ASTRUE

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Dec 9, 2011
Civ. NO. 09-1415-CL (D. Or. Dec. 9, 2011)
Case details for

COX v. ASTRUE

Case Details

Full title:COX v. ASTRUE

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Dec 9, 2011

Citations

Civ. NO. 09-1415-CL (D. Or. Dec. 9, 2011)