From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Dempster Mill Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 29, 1915
150 P. 465 (Okla. 1915)

Opinion

No. 4638

Opinion Filed June 29, 1915. Rehearing Denied September 7, 1915.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Brief — Reversal. Syllabus as in Carthage Superior Marble Limestone Co. v. Hugh McLennan Co. et al., 48 Okla. 245, 149 P. 1074.

(Syllabus by Rittenhouse, C.)

Error from the County Court, Stephens County; W.H. Admire, Judge.

Action by the Dempster Mill Manufacturing Company against H.J. Cox and another. Judgment for defendants, new trial granted, and defendants bring error. Reversed and remanded.

T.B. Reeder, for plaintiffs in error.

D.M. Smith, for defendant in error.


This is an appeal from the county court of Stephens county. There was judgment for plaintiffs in error, and a motion for new trial was sustained, from which ruling sustaining the motion for new trial plaintiffs in error have properly perfected an appeal to this court. They have served and filed a brief in compliance with the rules of this court, and defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for its failure to do so. We have examined the record, and the brief appears reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, and under the numerous authorities of this court, this court is not required to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment may be sustained, but may reverse the judgment in accordance with the prayer of the petition of plaintiffs in error. Phillips v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 99, 118 P. 371.

The judgment is therefore reversed and remanded.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Cox v. Dempster Mill Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 29, 1915
150 P. 465 (Okla. 1915)
Case details for

Cox v. Dempster Mill Mfg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:COX et al. v. DEMPSTER MILL MFG. CO

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 29, 1915

Citations

150 P. 465 (Okla. 1915)
150 P. 465

Citing Cases

Board of Com'rs Garvin Co. v. Pyeatt

It is the settled holding of this court, where such is the case, not to search for a theory upon which the…