From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cowgill v. Pierce

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 27, 2024
4:24-cv-01050-BRW (E.D. Ark. Dec. 27, 2024)

Opinion

4:24-cv-01050-BRW

12-27-2024

JEFFERY S. COWGILL ADC #145476 PLAINTIFF v. ROBERT PIERCE, Deputy Warden, ADC, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

BILLY ROY WILSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

I have reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe, and Plaintiff's objections (Doc Nos. 4, 7). After reviewing the record de novo, I adopt the Recommendation in its entirety.

Therefore, the Complaint (Doc. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. In the future, dismissal of this action should be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). I certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cowgill v. Pierce

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 27, 2024
4:24-cv-01050-BRW (E.D. Ark. Dec. 27, 2024)
Case details for

Cowgill v. Pierce

Case Details

Full title:JEFFERY S. COWGILL ADC #145476 PLAINTIFF v. ROBERT PIERCE, Deputy Warden…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 27, 2024

Citations

4:24-cv-01050-BRW (E.D. Ark. Dec. 27, 2024)