From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

COWE v. EQUIFAX CREDIT REPORTING

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Mar 8, 2010
CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:09-CV-991-TWT (N.D. Ga. Mar. 8, 2010)

Summary

dismissing case under Rule 41(b) where plaintiff delayed the case, ignored discovery, refused to attend his deposition, and showed contempt for the Federal Rules and orders of the court

Summary of this case from McLeod v. Ingram

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:09-CV-991-TWT.

March 8, 2010


ORDER


This is an action under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 29] of the Magistrate Judge recommending granting the Defendant's Second Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 25]. The Plaintiff has completely failed to comply with his discovery obligations. The Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court. The Defendant's Second Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 25] is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

COWE v. EQUIFAX CREDIT REPORTING

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Mar 8, 2010
CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:09-CV-991-TWT (N.D. Ga. Mar. 8, 2010)

dismissing case under Rule 41(b) where plaintiff delayed the case, ignored discovery, refused to attend his deposition, and showed contempt for the Federal Rules and orders of the court

Summary of this case from McLeod v. Ingram
Case details for

COWE v. EQUIFAX CREDIT REPORTING

Case Details

Full title:NEAL A. COWE, Plaintiff, v. EQUIFAX CREDIT REPORTING, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division

Date published: Mar 8, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:09-CV-991-TWT (N.D. Ga. Mar. 8, 2010)

Citing Cases

McLeod v. Ingram

Additionally, even if the Court were to construe Plaintiff's statements as an attempt to utilize the third…