Coward v. Coward

1 Citing case

  1. Nemer v. Nemer

    117 Cal.App.2d 35 (Cal. Ct. App. 1953)   Cited 9 times

    Under such circumstances a reviewing court may not substitute its views for those of the trial court. ( Coward v. Coward, 3 Cal.2d 340 [ 44 P.2d 358]; Angell v. Angell, 84 Cal.App.2d 339, 343 [ 191 P.2d 54].) [9] In any event, says plaintiff, the court was without power to enter the final judgment nunc pro tunc.