From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cowan v. Tennessee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 31, 2019
No. 18-1203-JDT-cgc (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 31, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-1203-JDT-cgc

01-31-2019

TERRELL DION COWAN, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF TENNESSEE, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT, CERTIFYING AN APPEAL WOULD NOT BE TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH AND NOTIFYING PLAINTIFF OF APPELLATE FILING FEE

Plaintiff Terrell Dion Cowan, a prisoner incarcerated at the Henry County Correctional Facility in Paris, Tennessee, filed a pro se civil complaint on October 11, 2018. (ECF No. 1.) The Court subsequently issued an order granting Cowan's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and assessing the civil filing fee pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)-(b). (ECF No. 4.)

On January 7, 2019, the Court issued an order dismissing the complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted but granted leave to file an amended complaint within 21 days. (ECF No. 6.) The order notified Plaintiff that if he "fails to file an amended complaint within the time specified, the Court will assess a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and enter judgment." (Id. at 6.) However, Cowan has not filed an amended complaint, and the time within which to do so has expired. Therefore, judgment will be entered in accordance with the January 7, 2019, order dismissing the complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1). Cowan's motion to appoint counsel, (ECF No. 5), is DENIED as moot.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the Court must also consider whether an appeal by Cowan in this case would be taken in good faith. The good faith standard is an objective one. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). The same considerations that led the Court to dismiss this case for failure to state a claim also compel the conclusion that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. Therefore, it is CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal in this matter by Cowan would not be taken in good faith.

The Court must also address the assessment of the $505 appellate filing fee if Cowan nevertheless appeals the dismissal of this case. A certification that an appeal is not taken in good faith does not affect an indigent prisoner plaintiff's ability to take advantage of the installment procedures contained in § 1915(b). See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997), partially overruled on other grounds by LaFountain, 716 F.3d at 951. McGore sets out specific procedures for implementing the PLRA, §§ 1915(a)-(b). Therefore, the Plaintiff is instructed that if he wishes to take advantage of the installment procedures for paying the appellate filing fee, he must comply with the procedures set out in the PLRA and McGore by filing an updated in forma pauperis affidavit and a current, certified copy of his inmate trust account for the six months immediately preceding the filing of the notice of appeal.

For analysis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) of future filings, if any, by Cowan, this is the first dismissal of one of his cases as frivolous or for failure to state a claim. This strike shall take effect when judgment is entered. See Coleman v. Tollefson, 135 S. Ct. 1759, 1763-64 (2015).

The Clerk is directed to prepare a judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ James D. Todd

JAMES D. TODD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cowan v. Tennessee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 31, 2019
No. 18-1203-JDT-cgc (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 31, 2019)
Case details for

Cowan v. Tennessee

Case Details

Full title:TERRELL DION COWAN, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF TENNESSEE, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 31, 2019

Citations

No. 18-1203-JDT-cgc (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 31, 2019)