From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cowan v. San Diego Sheriff's Dep't

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Dec 9, 2022
3:22-cv-0914-DMS-WVG (S.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-0914-DMS-WVG

12-09-2022

RICHARD L. COWAN, II, Booking No. 21135745, Plaintiff, v. SAN DIEGO SHERIFF'S DEP'T; GALLAGOS, Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION FOR FAILING TO PROSECUTE IN COMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER

HON. DANA M. SABRAW, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

I. Introduction

On June 21, 2022, Richard L. Cowan, II (“Plaintiff” or “Cowan”), who is proceeding pro se, was housed at the South Bay Detention Facility and filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in this Court. See ECF No. 1. Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See ECF No. 2.

On July 21, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and dismissed Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). See ECF No. 4. Plaintiff was granted forty-five (45) days from the date of the dismissal Order to file a First Amended Complaint. See id. at 9-10.

II. Discussion

Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint was due on or before September 6, 2022. To date, he has failed to amend, and has not requested an extension of time in which to do so. “The failure of the plaintiff eventually to respond to the court's ultimatum-either by amending the complaint or by indicating to the court that [he] will not do so-is properly met with the sanction of a Rule 41(b) dismissal.” Edwards v. Marin Park, 356 F.3d 1058, 1065 (9th Cir. 2004).

III. Conclusion and Order

Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this civil action in its entirety based on Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which § 1983 relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and § 1915A(b)(1), and his failure to prosecute as required by Court's July 21, 2022 Order.

The Court further CERTIFIES that an IFP appeal would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and DIRECTS the Clerk to enter a final judgment of dismissal and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cowan v. San Diego Sheriff's Dep't

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Dec 9, 2022
3:22-cv-0914-DMS-WVG (S.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Cowan v. San Diego Sheriff's Dep't

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD L. COWAN, II, Booking No. 21135745, Plaintiff, v. SAN DIEGO…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Dec 9, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-0914-DMS-WVG (S.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2022)