From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Covington v. Hawkings

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Jul 27, 2022
1:22CV529 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 27, 2022)

Opinion

1:22CV529

07-27-2022

MARCUS WAYNE COVINGTON, Plaintiff, v. JOHNNY HAWKINGS, Defendants.


ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Joe L. Webster United States Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff, a prisoner of the State of North Carolina, submitted a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The form of the Complaint is such that serious flaws make it impossible to further process the Complaint. The problems are:

1. The filing fee was not received nor was a proper affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis submitted, with sufficient information completed and signed by Plaintiff, to permit review. Plaintiff submitted an in forma pauperis application but did not properly complete the form by including the total deposits into his trust account in the past six months or the balance of that account.
2. Plaintiff's claims are not entirely clear but he appears to claim that jail personnel threw away or did not return some of his property. If so, he should be aware that he cannot raise a claim for a loss of property under § 1983 because there is no procedural due process claim under § 1983 for such takings if Plaintiff has a remedy in the state courts. Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 533 (1984); Chamberlain v. Jordan, No. 1:06CV73, 2006 WL 3386840, at *4 (M.D. N.C. Nov. 17, 2006) (unpublished). Prisoners in North Carolina may bring actions for conversion in the state courts based on any deprivation of property. Wilkins v. Whitaker, 714 F.2d 4, 6 (4th Cir. 1983). Plaintiff may also be attempting to raise a claim that Defendants' actions deprived him of access to the courts but,
if so, he must make this clear and state facts showing that he suffered some type of prejudice in his court cases as a result.

Consequently, the Complaint should be dismissed, but without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects of the present Complaint. To further aid Plaintiff, the Clerk is instructed to send Plaintiff new § 1983 forms, instructions, an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and a copy of pertinent parts of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8 (i.e., Sections (a) & (d)).

In forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that In forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. The Clerk is instructed to send Plaintiff § 1983 forms, instructions, an application to proceed In forma pauperis, and a copy of pertinent parts of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8 (i.e., Sections (a) & (d)).

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited above.


Summaries of

Covington v. Hawkings

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Jul 27, 2022
1:22CV529 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Covington v. Hawkings

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS WAYNE COVINGTON, Plaintiff, v. JOHNNY HAWKINGS, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Jul 27, 2022

Citations

1:22CV529 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 27, 2022)