Covington v. Covington

Full title: Rakedra D. COVINGTON, Respondent, v. Brent R. COVINGTON, Appellant.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Oct 15, 2019

590 S.W.3d 359 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

WD 82580

10-15-2019

Rakedra D. COVINGTON, Respondent, v. Brent R. COVINGTON, Appellant.

Brent R. Covington, Sr., Grandview, appellant pro se. David S. Rauzi, Kansas City for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Brent R. Covington, Sr., Grandview, appellant pro se.

David S. Rauzi, Kansas City for respondent.

Before Division Two: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton and Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judges

ORDER

Per Curiam

Brent R. Covington ("Appellant") appeals the circuit court's entry of a judgment granting an order of protection in favor of Rakedra D. Covington. ("Respondent"). Appellant contends the court erred in granting the protection order because Respondent did not present substantial evidence to support the court’s finding that Appellant was stalking, harassing, or following her or her new paramour. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)