From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coverdale v. Zucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 4, 2003
302 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-04438

Argued December 16, 2002.

February 4, 2003.

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff has the exclusive right to the possession of certain real property, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.), entered October 1, 2001, which denied her motion, among other things, to permanently enjoin the plaintiff from erecting certain signs at the entrance to a driveway on the property.

Herrick, Feinstein, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Scott E. Mollen and John P. Sheridan of counsel), for appellant.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, THOMAS A. ADAMS, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, and the order entered October 1, 2001, is vacated.

Since the order appealed from was issued after the plaintiff's death, and there has not been any substitution of a personal representative of his estate, it was a nullity and must be vacated. The purported appeal from the order must be dismissed (see Bluestein v. City of New York, 280 A.D.2d 506; Halperin v. Waldbaum's Supermarket, 236 A.D.2d 514, 515; Ludlom Stead v. Rezza, 118 A.D.2d 628).

FLORIO, J.P., O'BRIEN, ADAMS and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Coverdale v. Zucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 4, 2003
302 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Coverdale v. Zucker

Case Details

Full title:MILES COVERDALE, respondent, v. CYNTHIA ZUCKER, a/k/a CYNTHIA MARKS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 4, 2003

Citations

302 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
753 N.Y.S.2d 892

Citing Cases

Toro v. Village Mall at Hillcrest Condominium

Accordingly, the Court will not entertain this motion for leave to reargue. Furthermore, the prior order…

Toro v. Vill. Mall At Hillcrest Condo.

Accordingly, the Court will not entertain this motion for leave to reargue. Furthermore, the prior order…