From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cousett v. Corr. Corp. of Am.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 9, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00899-LTB (D. Colo. May. 9, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-cv-00899-BNB

05-09-2013

PRESTON MICHAEL COUSETT, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA, actually named as C.C.A., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Plaintiff, Preston Michael Cousett, is a Colorado Department of Corrections prisoner who is incarcerated at the Kit Carson Correctional Facility (KCCC) in Burlington, Colorado. He initiated this action by submitting a "Notice of Intent" complaining about the conditions of his confinement.

On April 9, 2013, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland reviewed the submitted document and determined that it was deficient. Magistrate Judge Boland directed Mr. Cousett to file a Prisoner Complaint on the court-approved form within thirty days of the April 9 Order. (See Doc. # 3). Magistrate Judge Boland further ordered Mr. Cousett to file, within thirty days, a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 on the court-approved form, or pay the $350.00 filing fee.

On May 3, 2013, Mr. Cousett filed a "Motion to Withdraw Without Prejudice" (Doc. # 4).

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) provides that "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment . . . ." No answer or motion for summary judgment has been filed by Defendants in this action. Further, a voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective immediately upon the filing of a written notice of dismissal, and no subsequent court order is necessary. See J. Moore, Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 41.02(2) (2d ed. 1995); Hyde Constr. Co. v. Koehring Co., 388 F.2d 501, 507 (10th Cir. 1968). The motion, therefore, closes the file as of May 3, 2013. See Hyde Constr. Co., 388 F.2d at 507. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the action is dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the voluntary dismissal is without prejudice and is effective as of May 3, 2013, the date Plaintiff filed the Motion to Withdraw Without Prejudice in this action.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 9th day of May, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

______________________________

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Cousett v. Corr. Corp. of Am.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 9, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00899-LTB (D. Colo. May. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Cousett v. Corr. Corp. of Am.

Case Details

Full title:PRESTON MICHAEL COUSETT, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL CORPORATION OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: May 9, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-cv-00899-LTB (D. Colo. May. 9, 2013)