From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Courville v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Nov 6, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0684 SEC. P (W.D. La. Nov. 6, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0684 SEC. P

11-06-2017

CHASE M. COURVILLE v. WARDEN SMITH, ET AL.


MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction [Doc. No. 36] and the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment [Doc. Nos. 32 & 42] are DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter is referred to the assigned magistrate judge to hold an evidentiary hearing on exhaustion (if defendants continue to maintain that defense) and on the merits (to include all witnesses and evidence to be presented by all parties), and thereafter, to issue findings to the court, via report and recommendation.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 6th day of November, 2017.

/s/ _________

ROBERT G. JAMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Courville v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Nov 6, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0684 SEC. P (W.D. La. Nov. 6, 2017)
Case details for

Courville v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:CHASE M. COURVILLE v. WARDEN SMITH, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 6, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0684 SEC. P (W.D. La. Nov. 6, 2017)