From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Courtney v. Beckett

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Jun 2, 2016
Case No. 2:15-CV-78 (W.D. Mich. Jun. 2, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 2:15-CV-78

06-02-2016

BRIAN KEITH COURTNEY, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN BECKETT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action on May 11, 2016. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on Plaintiff on May 11, 2016. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, filed May 11, 2016 (ECF No. 30), is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment based on Plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies (ECF Nos. 25, 28) are GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

A separate judgment will issue.

This case is concluded. Dated: June 2, 2016

/s/ Gordon J. Quist

GORDON J. QUIST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Courtney v. Beckett

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Jun 2, 2016
Case No. 2:15-CV-78 (W.D. Mich. Jun. 2, 2016)
Case details for

Courtney v. Beckett

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN KEITH COURTNEY, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN BECKETT, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 2, 2016

Citations

Case No. 2:15-CV-78 (W.D. Mich. Jun. 2, 2016)