From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Courthouse News Serv. v. Yamasaki

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 24, 2020
950 F.3d 640 (9th Cir. 2020)

Opinion

Nos. 17-56331 18-56216

02-24-2020

COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David YAMASAKI, in his official capacity as Court Executive Officer/Clerk of the Orange County Superior Court, Defendant-Appellee.

Rachel Matteo-Boehm (argued), Roger Myers, Katherine Keating, and Jonathan G. Fetterly, Bryan Cave LLP, San Francisco, California, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Robert A. Naeve (argued) and Cary D. Sullivan, Jones Day, Irvine, California; Nathaniel P. Garrett, Jones Day, San Francisco, California; for Defendant-Appellee. Caitlin V. Vogus (argued), Bruce D. Brown, and Gregg P. Leslie, The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 31 Media Organizations. Natasha Breaux, Haynes and Boone LLP, Houston, Texas; Mary-Christine Sungaila and Marco A. Pulido, Haynes and Boone LLP, Costa Mesa, California; for Amici Curiae Orange County Bar Association, Family Violence Appellate Project, National Association of Women Lawyers, Public Law Center, Legal Aid Society of Orange County, and Veterans Legal Institute.


Rachel Matteo-Boehm (argued), Roger Myers, Katherine Keating, and Jonathan G. Fetterly, Bryan Cave LLP, San Francisco, California, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Robert A. Naeve (argued) and Cary D. Sullivan, Jones Day, Irvine, California; Nathaniel P. Garrett, Jones Day, San Francisco, California; for Defendant-Appellee.

Caitlin V. Vogus (argued), Bruce D. Brown, and Gregg P. Leslie, The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 31 Media Organizations.

Natasha Breaux, Haynes and Boone LLP, Houston, Texas; Mary-Christine Sungaila and Marco A. Pulido, Haynes and Boone LLP, Costa Mesa, California; for Amici Curiae Orange County Bar Association, Family Violence Appellate Project, National Association of Women Lawyers, Public Law Center, Legal Aid Society of Orange County, and Veterans Legal Institute.

Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, N. Randy Smith, and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The district court’s preliminary injunction order, summary judgment order and order entering final judgment are vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion in Courthouse News Service v. Planet , 947 F.3d 581 (9th Cir. 2020). All pending motions are denied as moot. Each party shall bear its own costs. This order shall serve as the mandate in this appeal.


Summaries of

Courthouse News Serv. v. Yamasaki

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 24, 2020
950 F.3d 640 (9th Cir. 2020)
Case details for

Courthouse News Serv. v. Yamasaki

Case Details

Full title:COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAVID YAMASAKI, in his…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 24, 2020

Citations

950 F.3d 640 (9th Cir. 2020)

Citing Cases

Courthouse News Serv. v. Schaefer

Furthermore, the legal complexity is confirmed by the fact that different courts have come out to conflicting…