From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Courtesy Leasing, Inc. v. Christian

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 22, 1996
465 S.E.2d 443 (Ga. 1996)

Opinion

S95A1846

DECIDED JANUARY 22, 1996

Equity. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Gibson, pro hac vice.

Swift, Currie, McGhee Hiers, Susan A. Dewberry, for appellants.

Johnson Ward, Peter J. Quist, Arch W. McGarity, for appellee.


This case arises from the placement of an outdoor advertising sign on property owned by appellee Mrs. Martha Christian. Alleging that the sign had been placed on her property without her authorization, appellee filed suit for injunctive and legal relief against appellants Courtesy Leasing, Inc. and Pinnacle Outdoor, Inc. The trial court granted appellee an interlocutory injunction against appellants' continuing trespass on her property and, pending further order, also directed appellants to deposit into its registry "all rents, fees, income or other monies generated from the operation of the sign." This appeal is from that order of the trial court.

Appellants concede that "[a] continuing trespass may be enjoined in equity. [Cit.]" Lanier v. Ocean Pond Fishing Club, 253 Ga. 549, 550 (2) ( 322 S.E.2d 494) (1984). All that they urge on appeal is that the trial court erred in directing them to deposit into its registry all of the "monies generated from the operation of the sign." In this state, however, every court has the power "[t]o control, in the furtherance of justice, the conduct of its officers and all other persons connected with a judicial proceeding before it, in every matter appertaining thereto. . . ." OCGA § 15-1-3 (4). Pursuant to this statute, the courts of this state are given wide discretion in the management of the cases over which they preside. Atlanta Newspapers v. Grimes, 216 Ga. 74, 79 ( 114 S.E.2d 421) (1960). In this case, the entitlement as between appellee and appellants to any money received by virtue of the sign is in dispute. See OCGA §§ 44-11-7, 44-11-8, 44-11-9. We cannot say that, in ordering appellants to pay those monies into its registry, the trial court abused its discretion. Anderson v. Middleton, 263 Ga. 299 ( 430 S.E.2d 748) (1993). See also Anthony v. Anthony, 237 Ga. 872, 875 ( 230 S.E.2d 752) (1976) (appointment of a receiver).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.


DECIDED JANUARY 22, 1996.


Summaries of

Courtesy Leasing, Inc. v. Christian

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 22, 1996
465 S.E.2d 443 (Ga. 1996)
Case details for

Courtesy Leasing, Inc. v. Christian

Case Details

Full title:COURTESY LEASING, INC. ET AL. v. CHRISTIAN

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Jan 22, 1996

Citations

465 S.E.2d 443 (Ga. 1996)
465 S.E.2d 443

Citing Cases

Strange v. Housing Authority

OCGA § 9-5-4. If there is a continuing trespass, it may also be enjoined in equity. Courtesy Leasing v.…

Pope v. Pulte Home Corporation

See also Bullock v. Jeon, 226 Ga. App. 875-876 (1) ( 487 S.E.2d 692) (1997).Courtesy Leasing v. Christian,…