From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Courtemance v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Rhode Island
Aug 4, 2011
C.A. 10-427M (D.R.I. Aug. 4, 2011)

Opinion

C.A. 10-427M.

August 4, 2011


ORDER


The Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Lincoln D. Almond dated July 14, 2011 in the above-captioned matter is accepted pursuant to Title 28 United States Code § 636(b)(1). The Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse the Decision of the Commissioner is DENIED and the Defendant's Motion to Affirm the Decision of the Commissioner is GRANTED.

BY ORDER:


Summaries of

Courtemance v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Rhode Island
Aug 4, 2011
C.A. 10-427M (D.R.I. Aug. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Courtemance v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:TINA COURTEMANCE v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Secuirty…

Court:United States District Court, D. Rhode Island

Date published: Aug 4, 2011

Citations

C.A. 10-427M (D.R.I. Aug. 4, 2011)

Citing Cases

Joseph A. v. Kijakazi

An error at Step Two does not require remand as long as the sequential analysis continues and limitations…

James C. v. O'Malley

An error at Step Two does not require remand as long as the sequential analysis continues and limitations…