From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Courshon v. Mauroner-Craddock, Inc.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit
Apr 8, 1968
219 So. 2d 257 (La. Ct. App. 1968)

Opinion

No. 7293.

April 8, 1968.

For Opinion on Rehearing see 219 So.2d 258.

Appeal from 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge; Coleman Lindsey, Judge.

Clint L. Pierson, Baton Rouge, for Louisiana Ready-Mix Co. Inc.

Doris Gates Rankin, Baton Rouge, for Acme Brick Co.

Norman Sisson, Baton Rouge, for Better Heating Air Conditioning.

James Pierson, of Watson, Blanche, Wilson, Posner Thibaut, Baton Rouge, for Mid-South Door Co., Inc.

Ben W. Lightfoot, of Durrett, Hardin, Hunter, Dameron Fritchie, Baton Rouge, for Baton Rouge Lumber Co. Inc.

M. Aubrey McCleary, Jr., of McCollister, Belcher, McCleary Fazio, Baton Rouge, for Jack R. Courshon.

Before LANDRY, REID and BAILES, JJ.


This case was consolidated with No. 7292, also captioned Courshon v. Mauroner-Craddock, Inc., La. App., 219 So.2d 254. The facts and question of liability were decided and fully discussed by this court in the companion suit.

These cases had also been consolidated in the lower court for trial and the judgment rendered by the lower court encompassed both suits. The only difference in the two suits is the amount sued on under different construction mortgages.

For the reasons assigned in No. 7292, the judgment of the District Court is reversed and this case is remanded to the District Court for proper proceedings for the disbursement of funds in accordance with the reasons set forth in the companion suit.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Courshon v. Mauroner-Craddock, Inc.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit
Apr 8, 1968
219 So. 2d 257 (La. Ct. App. 1968)
Case details for

Courshon v. Mauroner-Craddock, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Jack R. COURSHON v. MAURONER-CRADDOCK, INC

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit

Date published: Apr 8, 1968

Citations

219 So. 2d 257 (La. Ct. App. 1968)

Citing Cases

American Bank Trust v. F W Const

Appellants contend the mortgage in question does not prime their liens under the above quoted language of the…