Summary
In Coursey v. Morton (132 N.Y. 556), after the assignment had been executed, the assignor withdrew from the bank $963.50 and delivered the same to his wife, who secreted it for about eight months, and it was only discovered upon a proceeding instituted for that purpose.
Summary of this case from Birdsall Mfg. Co. v. SchwarzOpinion
Argued January 21, 1892
Decided March 15, 1892
Louis Marshall for appellants.
Geo. Barrow, Goodelle Nottingham and Waters McLennan for respondents.
HAIGHT, J., reads for reversal.
All concur, except BRADLEY, VANN and BROWN, JJ., dissenting, who were of the opinion that, while the General Term might, with great propriety, have reversed the judgment upon the ground that the findings of the referee were opposed to the weight of evidence, still, as there was some evidence to support the referee's conclusion, this court could not interfere.
Judgment reversed.