From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Couram v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Aug 20, 2012
C/A No. 3:11-3200-MBS-PJG (D.S.C. Aug. 20, 2012)

Opinion

C/A No. 3:11-3200-MBS-PJG

08-20-2012

Glenda R. Couram, Plaintiff, v. Lula N. Davis; Shirley Rivers; Constance Rhett; Marcia Adams, former director or current director of SCDMV; Dottie Blankenship; Tosha Autry; SC Department of Motor Vehicles, in their official and individual capacities, Defendants.


ORDER AND OPINION

On June 27, 2012, this court issued an order adopting the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and denying Plaintiff's motion to remand because Plaintiff's proposed amended complaint contained federal causes of action. On July 11, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the court reconsider this order. The court notes that on August 7, 2012, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. The court further notes that this amended complaint does not contain any federal causes of action. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claims and accordingly remands this action to state court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c); Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343 (1988). Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Margaret B. Seymour

Chief United States District Judge

Columbia, South Carolina

August 20, 2012.


Summaries of

Couram v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Aug 20, 2012
C/A No. 3:11-3200-MBS-PJG (D.S.C. Aug. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Couram v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:Glenda R. Couram, Plaintiff, v. Lula N. Davis; Shirley Rivers; Constance…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

Date published: Aug 20, 2012

Citations

C/A No. 3:11-3200-MBS-PJG (D.S.C. Aug. 20, 2012)