From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

County of Delaware v. J.P. Mascaro Sons, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District
May 17, 2005
582 Pa. 590 (Pa. 2005)

Opinion

J-14-2005.

Argued March 8, 2005.

Decided May 17, 2005.

Appeal No. 93 MAP 2004 from the Order of the Superior Court entered on 8/1/03 at No. 509 EDA 2003 affirming the Order of the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division, entered on 5/1/02 at No. 99-3555, George A. Pagano, J.

Albert A. DeGennaro, Esq., Harleysville, for J.P. Mascaro Sons, Inc.

Ronald Lee Daugherty, Esq., Malcolm Stewart Gould, Esq., Martin R. Lentz, Esq., Philadelphia, for County of Delaware.

BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER, JJ.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, having found merit in Appellee's argument that the issue on which appeal was allowed does not control the ultimate disposition of the case since there are multiple unchallenged theories of liability supporting the Superior Court's disposition, we AFFIRM the Superior Court's order, without reaching the issue on which allocatur was granted.


Summaries of

County of Delaware v. J.P. Mascaro Sons, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District
May 17, 2005
582 Pa. 590 (Pa. 2005)
Case details for

County of Delaware v. J.P. Mascaro Sons, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:COUNTY OF DELAWARE, Appellee, v. J.P. MASCARO SONS, INC., Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District

Date published: May 17, 2005

Citations

582 Pa. 590 (Pa. 2005)
873 A.2d 1285

Citing Cases

Rounick v. Neducsin

Super.] 1993), appeal denied , [ ] 537 Pa. 633, 642 A.2d 486 ( [Pa.] 1994).County of Delaware v. J.P. Mascaro…

Cottman Ave. PRP Grp. v. Amec Foster Wheeler Envtl. Infrastructure Inc.

Id.Similarly, in County of Delaware v. J.P. Mascaro & Sons, Inc., 830 A.2d 587 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2003), aff'd,…