From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coulton v. Brittingham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 13, 1959
9 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Opinion

October 13, 1959


Order unanimously reversed, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements, and the motion to dismiss the action as against defendant F. A. Transportation of N.J., Inc., is granted, with $10 costs. The inordinate and inexcusable delay in the prosecution of the action, as well as the absence of any showing of merit, warrant the unconditional dismissal of the action as against the appealing defendant ( Gallagher v. Clafington, Inc., 7 A.D.2d 627, and cases cited therein).

Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.


Summaries of

Coulton v. Brittingham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 13, 1959
9 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)
Case details for

Coulton v. Brittingham

Case Details

Full title:MARTHA B. COULTON, as Administratrix D.B.N. of the Estates of PAUL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 13, 1959

Citations

9 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Citing Cases

Geller v. Rochambeau Apartments, Inc.

Order, dated March 28, 1960, granting motion to vacate the dismissal of the action and restoring cause to the…