Coulthrust v. Decker

Full title: DORRELL RICHENSON COULTHRUST, Petitioner, v. THOMAS DECKER, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, D. New Mexico

Date published: Apr 23, 2008

Civil No. 08-151 MV/ACT (D.N.M. Apr. 23, 2008)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-151 MV/ACT.

April 23, 2008

ORDER and JUDGMENT

MARTHA VAZQUEZ, District Judge

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the proposed findings and recommended disposition of the United States Magistrate Judge. [Docket No. 11.] Petitioner did not file a response. Moreover, Petitioner has failed to comply with D.N.M.LR-Civ. 83.6 which requires ". . . parties appearing pro se . . . to notify the Clerk, in writing, of any change in their mailing addresses . . ."

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the proposed findings and recommended disposition of the United States Magistrate Judge are hereby adopted by the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 filed February 8, 2008 is dismissed with prejudice.