From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coulter v. Tatananni

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 30, 2017
Civil Action No. 17-629 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 30, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 17-629

08-30-2017

JEAN COULTER, Plaintiff, v. BLAZE TATANANNI, et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell MEMORANDUM ORDER

This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.

On June 30, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 11) recommending that this case be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made, and Plaintiff has filed Objections. See Doc. 13.

After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the Objections thereto, the following Order is entered:

This case is DISMISSED, with prejudice, for want of subject matter jurisdiction, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11) hereby is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. August 30, 2017

s\Cathy Bissoon

Cathy Bissoon

United States District Judge cc (via First-Class, U.S. Mail): Jean Coulter
Post Office Box 8094
Philadelphia, PA 19101-8094


Summaries of

Coulter v. Tatananni

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 30, 2017
Civil Action No. 17-629 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 30, 2017)
Case details for

Coulter v. Tatananni

Case Details

Full title:JEAN COULTER, Plaintiff, v. BLAZE TATANANNI, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 30, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 17-629 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 30, 2017)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Bank of Am.

The Court cannot conclude under these circumstances that Plaintiff's claim for $8,000,000 bears any relation…