Coultas v. Dunbar

4 Citing cases

  1. Davis v. Standifer

    275 Ga. App. 769 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 38 times
    Finding sexual assault by a police officer that occurred during a traffic stop of plaintiff's vehicle was within the scope of the police officer's official duties

    (Citations omitted.) Coultas v. Dunbar, 220 Ga. App. 54, 58 ( 467 SE2d 373) (1996)." Hardin v. Phillips, 249 Ga. App. 541, 545 (1) ( 547 SE2d 565) (2001).

  2. Hardin v. Phillips

    249 Ga. App. 541 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 15 times
    Holding that individuals employed by a public college within the State university system are State employees as that term is defined in OCGA § 50–21–22

    (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Coultas v. Dunbar, 220 Ga. App. 54, 58 ( 467 S.E.2d 373) (1996). 2. Appellants' contention in their second enumeration of error that Phillips' complaint is also barred by an exception to the state's waiver of sovereign immunity is correct.

  3. Horton v. Whitaker

    238 Ga. App. 312 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 2 times

    In her sole enumeration of error, Horton contends that summary judgment was improperly granted because she was suing Whitaker in an individual capacity for injuries caused by Whitaker's violation of State law occurring while Whitaker was performing a ministerial duty as a State employee. Merely styling a suit against a public officer as one brought against such person personally does not deprive the officer of immunity to which she might otherwise be entitled under the Tort Claims Act. Coultas v. Dunbar, 220 Ga. App. 54, 58 ( 467 S.E.2d 373) (1996); Brooks v. Barry, 223 Ga. App. 648, 649 (1) ( 478 S.E.2d 616) (1996). Thus, the fact that Horton sued Whitaker as an individual would not preclude the assertion of the defense of immunity.

  4. Brooks v. Barry

    223 Ga. App. 648 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 5 times

    [Cit.]' [Cit.]" Coultas v. Dunbar, 220 Ga. App. 54, 58 ( 467 S.E.2d 373) (1996). There being no competent evidence in the record that Barry acted in any capacity other than his official capacity, the trial court correctly granted his motion to dismiss for failure to file the requisite ante litem notice.