From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coughlin v. Merliss

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 28, 2013
No. 61383 (Nev. May. 28, 2013)

Opinion

No. 61383

05-28-2013

ZACHARY COUGHLIN, Appellant, v. MATTHEW MERLISS, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from district court orders denying an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order or injunction and awarding attorney fees in a landlord-tenant matter. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Patrick Flanagan, Judge.

Appellant moved the district court for a temporary restraining order or injunction in an appeal from a justice court order in a landlord-tenant dispute. Following the denial of that motion, appellant appealed to this court. Subsequently, the district court entered an order awarding attorney fees to respondent and appellant also appealed from that order.

The district court has final appellate jurisdiction in all cases arising in justice courts. Nev. Const, art. 6, § 6; see also Waugh v. Casazza, 85 Nev. 520, 521, 458 P.2d 359, 360 (1969). Although NRAP 3A(b)(3) authorizes an appeal from an order refusing to grant an injunction, and NRAP 3A(b)(8) authorizes an appeal from a post-judgment order awarding attorney fees, see Winston Prods. Co., Inc. v. DeBoer, 122 Nev. 517, 525, 134 P.3d 726, 731 (2006) (recognizing that an order awarding attorney fees and costs is substantively appealable as a special order after final judgment), because the orders challenged in this case arose from the district court's exercise of appellate jurisdiction over an appeal from a justice court decision, the district court's orders were ostensibly rendered final and are not appealable to this court. For the same reasons, to the extent that appellant seeks to appeal from any other order or determination arising from the district court's appellate review of the justice court matter, this court likewise lacks jurisdiction to consider any such appeals. Accordingly, as we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Respondent's April 26, 2013, motion seeking to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction on other grounds and his April 26, 2013, motion to strike are denied as moot. To the extent that respondent seeks attorney fees based on the motion to dismiss this appeal, that request is denied. We further deny as moot any other requests for relief pending in this matter.

________________, J.

Gibbons

________________, J.

Douglas

________________, J.

Saitta
cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge

Zachary B. Coughlin

Richard G. Hill, Chartered

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Coughlin v. Merliss

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 28, 2013
No. 61383 (Nev. May. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Coughlin v. Merliss

Case Details

Full title:ZACHARY COUGHLIN, Appellant, v. MATTHEW MERLISS, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: May 28, 2013

Citations

No. 61383 (Nev. May. 28, 2013)