From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coughlan v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 20, 1955
221 F.2d 117 (9th Cir. 1955)

Opinion

No. 14726.

April 20, 1955.

Cornelius P. Coughlan, Fairbanks, Alaska, for appellant.

Theodore F. Stevens, U.S. Atty., George M. Yeager, Asst. U.S. Atty., Fairbanks, Alaska, for appellee.

Before STEPHENS, HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges.


Petitioner, an attorney at law admitted to practice his profession in the territory of Alaska, asks us to grant him the right to file a supersedeas bond under the provisions of Rule 73(d), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Title 28 U.S.C.A. The practical effect of the filing of the bond as requested would be to suspend the operation of the judgment and permit petitioner to continue as an officer of the court in the high trust capacity of representing clients in court and out. We do not think the function of the provision for a supersedeas bond and order deprives the court of its inherent right to protect the integrity of its proceedings. Judgment of disbarment was ordered after a trial before a United States District Judge, and the judgment is now on appeal to this court. We decline to interfere in its operation, but suggest that the appeal be submitted for decision with as little delay as the situation permits.

The motion is denied.


Summaries of

Coughlan v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 20, 1955
221 F.2d 117 (9th Cir. 1955)
Case details for

Coughlan v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Cornelius P. COUGHLAN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 20, 1955

Citations

221 F.2d 117 (9th Cir. 1955)
15 Alaska 687

Citing Cases

Saylor v. Lindsley

An adjudication upon the merits in a stockholder derivative suit — a form of a true class action — is binding…