From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cottrell v. Wong

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 22, 2009
No. CIV S-07-2574 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-2574 GEB EFB P.

December 22, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On September 17, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fifteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 17, 2009, are adopted in full;

2. The November 7, 2008, motion to dismiss on the ground that plaintiff failed to exhaust the available administrative remedies with respect to his claims against Plainer, Cook and Wong is granted;

3. Plaintiff's claims against Plainer, Cook and Wong are dismissed without prejudice;

4. Plaintiff's claims against Huston in his official capacity are dismissed; and,

5. Defendant Huston is directed to file an answer to the complaint within 30 days.


Summaries of

Cottrell v. Wong

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 22, 2009
No. CIV S-07-2574 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2009)
Case details for

Cottrell v. Wong

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL M. COTTRELL, Plaintiff, v. R.K. WONG, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 22, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-07-2574 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2009)