From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cottrell v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Mar 31, 2017
No. C16-5079 RBL-KLS (W.D. Wash. Mar. 31, 2017)

Opinion

No. C16-5079 RBL-KLS

03-31-2017

SHAWN ALLEN COTTRELL, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOES 1-25, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation, [Dkt 16], and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. [Dkt 15]

(2) Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice on the grounds that it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and the dismissal shall count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.

DATED this 31st day of March, 2017.

/s/_________

Ronald B. Leighton

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cottrell v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Mar 31, 2017
No. C16-5079 RBL-KLS (W.D. Wash. Mar. 31, 2017)
Case details for

Cottrell v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN ALLEN COTTRELL, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOES 1-25, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Mar 31, 2017

Citations

No. C16-5079 RBL-KLS (W.D. Wash. Mar. 31, 2017)

Citing Cases

Bond v. S. Cent. Corr. Facility Med. Staff

In addition, the collective grouping of all medical staff as a single defendant is insufficient to enable…