From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cotton v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 22, 2008
2:06-cv-1107-GEB-DAD-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2008)

Opinion

2:06-cv-1107-GEB-DAD-P.

January 22, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On December 7, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 7, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's claims against defendant Dr. Fleischman are dismissed without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m).


Summaries of

Cotton v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 22, 2008
2:06-cv-1107-GEB-DAD-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2008)
Case details for

Cotton v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:TREANDOUS A. COTTON, Plaintiff, v. D.L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 22, 2008

Citations

2:06-cv-1107-GEB-DAD-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2008)