At the outset we note that no transcript was prepared of the hearing on the motions for summary judgment and therefore this Court assumes that the evidence presented supported the trial court's judgment. Cotton v. Ray, 276 Ga. App. 682 ( 624 SE2d 271) (2005). Although we do not have the benefit of a transcript, in its brief in opposition to Smith Mechanical's motion for summary judgment, Owners made the following argument concerning the issue of damages:
In the absence of a transcript showing what evidence was presented at the hearing, and nothing contrary appearing in the record, we must assume that the trial court's evidentiary findings were correct and supported by the evidence presented at the hearing. See Cotton v. Ray, 276 Ga. App. 682 ( 624 SE2d 271) (2005). "Appellate courts will review only evidence presented to the trial court before its ruling on the motion.