From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cotton v. People

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 25, 2013
Case No. 1:13-cv-00977-SKO-HC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:13-cv-00977-SKO-HC

2013-09-25

BRANDEN DOYLE COTTON, Petitioner, v. THE PEOPLE, Respondents.


ORDER TO PETITIONER TO SIGN AND

RETURN THE CONSENT OR DECLINE FORM

WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF SERVICE,

OR FACE DISMISSAL OF THE ACTION

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR PETITIONER'S

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT

ORDER (DOCS. 2, 4)


ORDER TO THE CLERK TO SEND TO

PETITIONER WITH THIS ORDER ANOTHER

ORDER RE: CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR

REASSIGNMENT


PETITIONER'S DEADLINE:

THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF

SERVICE OF THIS ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 303. Pending before the Court is the petition, which was filed on June 26, 2013.

I. Background

Petitioner filed his petition on June 26, 2013.

On June 26, 2013, an order issued from this Court to Petitioner to complete and return to the Court within thirty (30) days a form indicating whether Petitioner consented or declined to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge to conduct all further proceedings in this case. (Doc. 2-1.) On the same date, the order was served by mail on Petitioner at the address listed in the docket. Over thirty days passed without Petitioner's responding to the Court's order as directed.

On August 6, 2013, this Court issued another order that Petitioner complete and return to the Court within thirty (30) days a form indicating whether or not Petitioner consented or declined to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge to conduct all further proceedings in this case. (Doc. 4.) On the same date, the order was served by mail on Petitioner at the address listed in the docket. Over thirty (30) days have passed and Petitioner did not respond to the Court's order as directed.

Both orders informed Petitioner that the form must be completed and returned regardless of the choice exercised by any other party. (Doc. 2-1 at 1; doc. 4.)

II. Order to Complete Form or Suffer Dismissal of the Proceeding

Petitioner has failed to comply with the Court's repeated orders to complete and sign a form concerning consent or request for reassignment.

A failure to comply with an order of the Court may result in sanctions, including dismissal, pursuant to the inherent power of the Court, federal statute, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), 11; Local Rule 110; Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 31, 42-43 (1991).

Petitioner is being given one more opportunity to complete and sign one section of the consent form and to return the form to the Court. Petitioner is INFORMED that if he fails to complete, sign, and return the form within thirty days after service of this order, this case will be dismissed without prejudice for Petitioner's failure to comply with an order of the Court.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner is GRANTED thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order to complete, sign, and return the consent or decline portion of the Court's order re: consent or request for reassignment.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to send to Petitioner with this order another order re: consent or request for reassignment. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Cotton v. People

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 25, 2013
Case No. 1:13-cv-00977-SKO-HC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Cotton v. People

Case Details

Full title:BRANDEN DOYLE COTTON, Petitioner, v. THE PEOPLE, Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 25, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:13-cv-00977-SKO-HC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2013)