From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cotton v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 2, 2020
NO. EDCV 18-2343-VAP (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2020)

Opinion

NO. EDCV 18-2343-VAP (AGR)

10-02-2020

ROBERT A. COTTON, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"). No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Report.

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

(1) The County Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 38) is GRANTED as follows: (a) Claims One through Five, Seven, Thirteen and Fifteen are dismissed with leave to amend; and (b) Claims Twelve and Fourteen are dismissed without leave to amend;

(2) The City Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 41) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: (a) all federal and state claims against Defendants Woolbright and Gomez are dismissed without leave to amend; (b) the motion to dismiss Claim One is denied to the extent it asserts a Fourth Amendment claim against Defendants Arnola, Echevarra, Guzman and Thomas based on Plaintiff's arrest; (c) the remainder of Claim One is dismissed with leave to amend; (d) Claims Two through Five, Seven and Fifteen are dismissed with leave to amend; and (e) Claims Eight through Fourteen are dismissed without leave to amend;

(3) Defendant Shiomoto's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 43) is GRANTED and all federal and state claims against her are dismissed without leave to amend;

(4) Defendants Barba and Pellis are dismissed with prejudice from this action (Order dated April 9, 2019, Dkt. No. 8); and

(5) Plaintiff is granted leave to file a Third Amended Complaint consistent with the Report within 30 days after entry of this Order.

If Plaintiff chooses to file a Third Amended Complaint, it must be filed within 30 days after entry of this Order, it must bear the docket number assigned to this case, be labeled "Third Amended Complaint," and be complete in and of itself without reference to the original complaint, attachment, pleading or other documents.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to provide Plaintiff with a blank pro se civil rights complaint form.

Plaintiff is advised that if he fails to file a timely and corrected Third Amended Complaint within 30 days after the entry of this order, this action may be dismissed as set forth above. DATED: October 2, 2020

/s/_________

VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cotton v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 2, 2020
NO. EDCV 18-2343-VAP (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2020)
Case details for

Cotton v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT A. COTTON, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 2, 2020

Citations

NO. EDCV 18-2343-VAP (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2020)

Citing Cases

Sanchez v. Cnty. of Sacramento

There is nothing in the SAC or the present record demonstrating, let alone alleging, that the County and SCSD…

Barge v. Horwitz

Where the towing and impoundment of a car comports with California law, the second element is not met and…