From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cottingham v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 10, 2012
No. 2: 12-cv-0057 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2: 12-cv-0057 KJN P

04-10-2012

RUSSELL G. COTTINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT JONES, Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On March 2, 2012, the undersigned granted plaintiff thirty days to file a second amended complaint. Thirty days passed and plaintiff did not file a second amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to file a second amended complaint in compliance with the March 2, 2012 order.

________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Cottingham v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 10, 2012
No. 2: 12-cv-0057 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Cottingham v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL G. COTTINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT JONES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 10, 2012

Citations

No. 2: 12-cv-0057 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2012)