Opinion
February 17, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.).
Since the deposition testimony of defendant-appellant's account executive stated that defendant-appellant's superintendent had direct dealings with the subcontractors at the work site, an issue of fact exists as to whether defendant-appellant, as the general contractor, had supervisory control over its subcontractors and thus could be held liable for a subcontractor's allegedly negligent actions (see, Hunter v. BTC Block 17/18, 210 A.D.2d 968).
Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rubin, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.