From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cotter v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 26, 1975
48 A.D.2d 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

June 26, 1975


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 25, 1974, denying plaintiff's motion to restore the case to the calendar, unanimously reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, and said motion granted, without costs or disbursements. Though the instant action is of ancient vintage and had been on the calendar numerous times, counsel's failure to appear on the date fixed for trial was due to his actual engagement in trial of another case in Supreme Court, Suffolk County. Under such circumstance, the cause should have been "held subject" (22 N.Y.CRR 660.5[e]) and its dismissal for nonappearance was an improvident exercise of discretion.

Concur — Markewich, J.P., Kupferman, Murphy, Capozzoli and Lynch, JJ.


Summaries of

Cotter v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 26, 1975
48 A.D.2d 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Cotter v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH COTTER, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 26, 1975

Citations

48 A.D.2d 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Saccone v. Saber

However, an abuse of discretion may lie in instances where an adjournment request has been rejected following…

Matter of Minter

Moreover, a court-appointed Law Guardian — whose primary responsibility is to ensure that the best interests…