From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cotten v. Laurel Park Estates

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1928
141 S.E. 339 (N.C. 1928)

Summary

In Cotten v. Laurel Park Estates, Inc., post, 848, 141 S.E. 339, it is said at p. 340: "The defendants argue, with persuasive but not convincing reasoning, that there is a misjoinder of causes of action and parties; that the complaint is bad for multifariousness; that the complaint contains inconsistent and contradictory causes of action.

Summary of this case from Scales v. Trust Co.

Opinion

(Filed 31 January, 1928)

Pleadings — Demurrer — Misjoinder of Parties and Causes.

Held, in this case a cause of actionable fraud was alleged connecting all the parties with the grounds thereof, and is not demurrable for misjoinder of parties and causes of action.

APPEAL by defendants, Central Bank and Trust Company, Standard Mortgage Company, and E. E. Reid, from Lyon, Emergency Judge, at September Term, 1927, of MECKLENBURG. Affirmed.

Carswell Ervin and John M. Robinson for plaintiff.

Hunter M. Jones, Merrick, Barnard Heazel and Tillett, Tillett Kennedy for Central Bank and Trust Company and Standard Mortgage Company.

Kester Walton for E. E. Reid.


The defendants demurred for misjoinder of causes of action and for misjoinder of parties, and appealed to the Supreme Court from the judgment overruling the demurrer.

The defendants argue, with persuasive but not convincing reasoning, that there is a Misjoinder of causes of action and parties. That the complaint is bad for multifariousness; that the complaint contains inconsistent and contradictory causes of action. We cannot so interpret it. Taking the three causes of action, although inartificially set forth, as a whole — not disconnectedly — we think under a liberal construction, "with a view to substantial justice between the parities," it is one connected story — a common scheme, or plot, practically a conspiracy. The complaint alleges an actionable fraud of the most nefarious kind, connecting all of the defendants and charging, with particularity, all of them with full knowledge and complicity. The causes of action arise out of the same transaction or transaction connected with the same subject of action. All flow from the same source, all are woven together, yoked together, in a scheme, plot or conspiracy to defraud the plaintiff, "If the fountain is tainted, so likewise is the water that flows from it into all the streams;" Fisher v. Trust Co., N.C. at p. 228. On a demurrer, the facts as stated in the complaint are taken ass true. The entire matter can be settled by proper issues in one action. C. S., 456; C. S., 507; C. S., 535; Fisher v. Trust Co., 138 N.C. P. 224; Robinson v. Williams, 189 N.C. 256; Wadford v. Davis, 192 N.C. 484; Killian v. Hanna, 193 N.C. 17; S. v. McCanless, 193 N.C. 200. The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Cotten v. Laurel Park Estates

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1928
141 S.E. 339 (N.C. 1928)

In Cotten v. Laurel Park Estates, Inc., post, 848, 141 S.E. 339, it is said at p. 340: "The defendants argue, with persuasive but not convincing reasoning, that there is a misjoinder of causes of action and parties; that the complaint is bad for multifariousness; that the complaint contains inconsistent and contradictory causes of action.

Summary of this case from Scales v. Trust Co.
Case details for

Cotten v. Laurel Park Estates

Case Details

Full title:MRS. GLADYS PARKER COTTEN v. LAUREL PARK ESTATES, INC., CENTRAL BANK AND…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1928

Citations

141 S.E. 339 (N.C. 1928)
141 S.E. 339

Citing Cases

Trust Co. v. Peirce

The one circumstance which differentiates this case from those cited by the defendants, especially Emerson v.…

Scales v. Trust Co.

The matter complained of by defendants can be determined upon the trial in the court below when plaintiff…