From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coto v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jul 31, 2019
278 So. 3d 762 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 3D19-1387

07-31-2019

Mario Tauro COTO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Mario Tauro Coto, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.


Mario Tauro Coto, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and LOGUE and HENDON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Smith, 241 So. 3d 53, 54 (Fla. 2018) (holding, in answer to a certified question of great public importance, that a defendant who claims that the offense as charged in the information is barred by the statute of limitations must raise the issue in the trial court in order to preserve the issue for direct appeal). See also State v. Callaway, 658 So. 2d 983, 988 (Fla. 1995), receded from on other grounds in Dixon v. State, 730 So. 2d 265 (Fla. 1999) (holding: "A rule 3.800 motion can be filed at any time, even decades after a sentence has been imposed, and as such, its subject matter is limited to those sentencing issues that can be resolved as a matter of law without an evidentiary determination"); Potter v. State, 769 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (same).


Summaries of

Coto v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jul 31, 2019
278 So. 3d 762 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Coto v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mario Tauro COTO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Jul 31, 2019

Citations

278 So. 3d 762 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)