From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cotner v. Trammell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Sep 12, 2012
No. CIV 12-270-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Sep. 12, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV 12-270-RAW-KEW

09-12-2012

ROBERT E. COTNER, Petitioner, v. ANITA TRAMMELL, Warden, Respondent.


OPINION AND ORDER

Petitioner has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The respondent is hereby ordered to show cause why the writ should not issue by filing an answer to the petition within thirty (30) days. Extensions of time will be granted for good cause only and in no event for longer than an additional twenty (20) days.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of September 2012.

_______________

RONALD A. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cotner v. Trammell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Sep 12, 2012
No. CIV 12-270-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Sep. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Cotner v. Trammell

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT E. COTNER, Petitioner, v. ANITA TRAMMELL, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Sep 12, 2012

Citations

No. CIV 12-270-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Sep. 12, 2012)